Tom Cunningham Design

Case Study

Honeywell Sensepoint XCL

Designing a smarter installation and maintenance experience for industrial gas detection.

As part of a collaboration with Design Partners and Honeywell, I led the digital experience design for a connected mobile solution that worked alongside the Honeywell Sensepoint XCL industrial gas detector.

Honeywell Sensepoint XCL mobile product interface concept.
Mobile companion experience for installation, commissioning, and maintenance workflows.
Company / Client Honeywell, with Design Partners
My role Digital Experience Lead
Timeline Commercial product programme
Focus Installation, commissioning, calibration, and maintenance workflows

Project Snapshot

A connected field workflow for a safety-critical product

Problem

Manual, fragmented work

Gas detector installation and maintenance was traditionally labour-intensive, paper-heavy, and often required engineers to work in pairs.

Challenge

Reduce friction without reducing confidence

Industrial gas detectors are critical safety products. The experience needed to simplify complex workflows while preserving trust, sequence, and technical accuracy.

Contribution

Digital lead across research and product design

I led ethnographic research, translated field insight into product requirements, designed key mobile flows, prototyped realistic scenarios, and supported hardware-software alignment.

Outcome

A more efficient product ecosystem

The final product experience contributed to measurable efficiency improvements across installation, commissioning, calibration, and maintenance.

Impact Signals

Efficiency gains across the field workflow

15 minInstallation reduction per device
8 hrsWeekly paperwork reduction
1 personCalibration workflow enabled
5 marketsRemote research across Ireland, UK, Germany, US, and Netherlands

Before / After

From legacy constraints to guided field confidence

Before

Slow, manual, paper-heavy

  • Engineers frequently worked in pairs.
  • Paper forms introduced duplicated effort and potential for error.
  • Installation and commissioning involved multiple steps across hardware and documentation.
  • Workflows were shaped by legacy constraints rather than the real needs of field engineers.
After

Connected, sequenced, reliable

  • A mobile companion experience connected wirelessly to the physical detector.
  • The app guided engineers through installation, commissioning, calibration, and maintenance.
  • Status, sequence, and completion feedback helped engineers know what needed to happen next.
  • The digital product quietly removed effort from a larger safety-critical system.

System Model

The product experience had to work across physical, digital, and compliance touchpoints

Process

From field research to realistic product validation

01

Field research

I led ethnographic research across three countries, shadowing and interviewing gas maintenance engineers as they completed real jobs.

02

Remote validation

We conducted remote interviews with users in Ireland, the UK, Germany, the US, and the Netherlands, and gathered survey responses from 13 expert users.

03

Workshops

We ran workshops with Honeywell and Design Partners to align around product opportunity, user needs, and the end-to-end experience.

04

Design approach

The design challenge was not simply to create an app interface. It was to reduce friction across a safety-critical field workflow.

05

Native prototype

To make testing realistic, we created a native prototype that interacted with the physical device.

06

User testing

We tested in Ireland and the Netherlands, observing how engineers interacted with the app, the detector, and the broader workflow.

Artifacts

Design Decisions

Principles that shaped the experience

Sequence

Make the next step obvious

For field engineers, the most important thing was knowing what needed to happen next and whether the task had been completed successfully.

Status

Show whether the device is responding

The app experience focused on clarity and confidence, especially around wireless connection, technical feedback, and completion states.

Context

Design for real field conditions

The value of the work came from understanding the engineer, the device, the environment, paperwork, safety requirements, and business need for efficiency.

Reflection

Designing across physical and digital touchpoints

This project was a strong example of designing across physical and digital touchpoints. The value of the work came from understanding the full service context: the engineer, the device, the environment, the paperwork, the safety requirements, and the business need for efficiency.

Rather than treating the app as a standalone interface, we designed it as part of a broader product ecosystem. The digital experience helped make the physical product easier to install, commission, use, and maintain.

For me, the project reinforced the importance of field research, realistic prototyping, and designing around the actual conditions in which people work. In complex industrial environments, great experience design is often about removing small but meaningful points of friction from a larger system.